Pricing

Industries, Fintech & neobanks

Decisions that respect your CFO and your compliance team.

Subscription-tier upgrades, retention nudges, and pricing personalisation, with audit-grade causal proof.

Neobanks and investing apps monetise through tiered subscriptions. They obsess over D30 retention and upgrade rates; they distrust their A/B tests because conversion is noisy and attribution is sparse post-ATT. A five-percent lift in subscription retention compounds into eight-figure annual revenue. Doubly-robust off-policy evaluation is the credibility layer the CFO demands.

Bridge of light representing trust between trader and platform

What agents handle

Workflow

Tier-upgrade prompt

Before

Same upsell modal to every free-tier user

After

CATE-targeted: shown only to users with positive predicted uplift

Result

+22% upgrade rate on targeted cohort

Workflow

Dormant-account nudge

Before

Email blast to all users inactive 14+ days

After

Bandit picks channel + copy + timing per user

Result

+8% reactivation, half the send volume

Workflow

Churn-save offer

Before

Fixed 50% discount offered at cancel flow

After

Propensity-targeted discount with full DR readout

Result

Revenue per save up 31% on the same offer budget

Workflow

Feature-discovery surfacing

Before

Generic onboarding tour, same to all

After

Slate-ranking bandit per user profile and device

Result

+14% feature adoption D30

Globe representing cross-border financial reach

The challenges we solve

  • Regulatory caution on personalisation, every change needs an audit trail
  • CFO scepticism of growth-team A/B claims; the boardroom expects holdout-validated numbers
  • High cost of false-positive UI changes, a bad paywall change is a quarterly miss
  • Subscription cohorts churn and renew on monthly clocks that confound naive A/B tests
  • Per-environment isolation matters: test keys must never touch live data

Append-only decision logs

Every assignment is immutable. The propensity logged at serve time is the propensity OPE consumes. No revisionism, compliance review can replay the full decision history.

Per-tenant isolation

Admin and org roles enforced at the dependency layer, not the query layer. Live and test API keys partition cleanly. Cross-tenant access is structurally impossible.

Revocable API keys per environment

Scoped (decide-only / decide+reward / full) and instantly revocable. SHA-256 at rest. Plaintext shown once at issuance.

Worked audit example

What a doubly-robust re-analysis surfaced for Lyra.

Series-B neobank · ~$18M ARR · MENA + EU · 482,711 free-tier accounts · case ID LYRA-2026Q1-AUDIT-002

What their team reported

Premium upgrade prompt timing test: week-2 (+4.4%) vs week-4 (4.1%) on the upgrade rate. p = 0.02. Team called it "winner, ship week-2" and rolled to 100% of free-tier users.

What our re-analysis found

Doubly-robust per-cohort: +11.7% lift on balance-high × spend-regular (the engine), but −8.2% on balance-low × spend-irregular, a 14% slice being prompted into downgrade/cancel. The t-test averaged it away.

Recommendation · projected annualised impact

Personalise the prompt: send to the positive-uplift cohorts (~58% of base), suppress for the negative cell. Lifts net upgrade rate from +6.4% to +11.7% and preserves retention on the irregular-spend cohort.

+$1.4M / yr ARR

Same shape we'll send back on your last A/B test, in three business days.

Read the full audit PDF →

Audit your last paywall test — free.

One CSV, one experiment config. Same-shape readout back in three business days.

Send my test